RULE-MAKING, RULE-TAKING OR RULE-REJECTING UNDER THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE: A CENTRAL ASIAN PERSPECTIVE
| dc.contributor.author | Nurgozhayeva, Roza | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-05T03:43:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-05T03:43:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-05-21 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Since the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was announced in 2013, China’s expanding economic, geopolitical, and business presence demonstrates its eagerness to play a more significant role in the systems of international governance and law. The BRI’s scale and influence have captured immense attention among politicians, policymakers, experts, and academics. They offer numerous interpretations of the BRI’s global and regional impact. If China claims to be a stakeholder in the international system, what are the implications for the legal systems of the BRI countries and their governance systems? To what extent does the BRI lead to the expansion of China’s institutions and legal norms? How can the BRI countries ensure that their interests in BRI projects are adequately protected? This article analyses the Central Asian perspective on the BRI. Central Asia and Kazakhstan, in particular, have strategic relevance to the BRI. Remarkably, the BRI was launched during the visit of President Xi Jinping to Kazakhstan, which means that Kazakhstan plays a critical transit role as China’s pivot to Europe. Although the BRI is an ambitious global strategy, it has provoked much criticism, especially in liberal countries. Despite China’s efforts to promote the BRI as a win–win endeavour, China’s increased economic and political influence has already led to heightened scrutiny of its role in shaping ideology, economic development, and the legal and institutional landscapes. While many academic publications address different perspectives of the BRI, the context behind BRI projects requires further attention. This article contributes to the literature by studying BRI projects in Kazakhstan and their legal framework and governance. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Nurgozhayeva, R. (2020). Rule-Making, Rule-Taking or Rule-Rejecting under the Belt and Road Initiative: A Central Asian Perspective. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 8(1), 250–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxaa006 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/6362 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law | en_US |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ | * |
| dc.subject | Type of acess: Open Access | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rule-Making | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rule-Taking | en_US |
| dc.subject | Rule-Rejecting | en_US |
| dc.subject | Central Asia | en_US |
| dc.title | RULE-MAKING, RULE-TAKING OR RULE-REJECTING UNDER THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE: A CENTRAL ASIAN PERSPECTIVE | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| workflow.import.source | science |