What Went Wrong? A Five-School Review of Master’s Theses Reference List

dc.contributor.authorYap, Joseph M.
dc.contributor.authorGroen, Carlene
dc.contributor.authorKamilova, Yelizaveta
dc.contributor.authorTerzi, Paschalia
dc.contributor.authorZvonareva, Darya
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-06T04:32:56Z
dc.date.available2018-08-06T04:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-03
dc.description.abstractA good citation and referencing practice starts when a student correctly cites and follows the specified citation format. Academic integrity is closely associated with plagiarism but there is another particular error that academics neglect to verify: the proper formatting of a reference list based on a particular citation style. The purpose of the study is to trace, review and analyze the reference list of selected master’s theses submitted to one of the leading universities in Kazakhstan. Results showed a high number of referencing errors. Having a standard format will prevent future mistakes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationYap, J.M., Groen, C., Kamilova, Y., Terzi, P. & Zvonareva, D. (2018). What went wrong? A five-school review of master’s theses reference list. The Reference Librarian. DOI: 10.1080/02763877.2018.1503989en_US
dc.identifier.issn1541-1117
dc.identifier.urihttp://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/3378
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.subjectreferencingen_US
dc.subjectreference formatsen_US
dc.subjectgraduate studentsen_US
dc.subjectthesesen_US
dc.subjectKazakhstanen_US
dc.titleWhat Went Wrong? A Five-School Review of Master’s Theses Reference Listen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
workflow.import.sourcescience

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
What Went Wrong A Five School Review of Master s Theses Reference List.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections